ASSIGNMENT 4: METHODS AND MEASURES

Participants
Procedures
Task Scenarios

Test Measures

Participants

While we did not seek out participants who explicitly fit our user profile and project personas, we wanted users who shared a general set of qualifications that would indicate they were both familiar with the related technologies and capable enough to interact with our system. We chose our participants based on the following general criteria:

  • Participants should fit our user profile age range
  • Participants should have access to a digital camera
  • Participants should be cell phone users.

We actively sought out people we knew, but who were not close friends or SIMS students (using close friends or fellow students could have led to a biased sampling of test cases). It was coincidence that all participants were female. All participants were personally asked by members of the Photocat team to take part in usability testing. (From past experience, we've found this to be a better way of recruiting participants compared to sending out impersonal mass e-mails.)

Participant #1

  • Female
  • Early 20s
  • Single
  • Student
  • 5th Year Undergraduate
  • Environmental Science Major
  • Lives on UC Berkeley campus in Graduate Student Housing
  • Takes and shares digital photos

Participant #2

  • Female
  • Early 20s
  • Single
  • Full-Time Employed
  • Lives with in Berkeley with sister
  • Doesn’t own digital camera
  • Uses Poloroid and regular 35mm camera

Participant #3

  • Female
  • 33 years old
  • Single
  • Lives in Alameda
  • Graphic Designer/Full-Time Student
  • Pre-Law and Creative Writing
  • Owns a digital camera

TOP

Procedures

Our testing procdures were divided into three parts: Introduction, Task Scenarios, and Debriefing. The text that follows served as our script.

Introduction

Thank you for agreeing to help us test PhotoCat, our class project for IS 213--User Interface Design and Development. Introduce the team members.

PhotoCat is a Web-based photo management system that allows you to view, manage, and share your digital-camera photos. You access PhotoCat using a Web browser.

Within the PhotoCat interface, you can organize your photos by:

  • The time they were taken.
  • The location where they were taken.
  • The people who were present when the photos were taken.

During this testing, you will be interacting with a large-scale, paper-based version of PhotoCat. One of the team members will be acting as the “computer,” and will make updates to the paper interface as you interact with it.

The PhotoCat interface includes:

  • A novel "Bullseye View" that displays all or some of your photos based on the time they were taken, the location where they were taken, and people who were present when the photos were taken.
  • A set of navigational menus and buttons that allow you to filter and organize the photos being displayed in the interface.
  • A "Photo Bin" in which you can view and share photos of interest.
  • A popup "Details" display that allows you to view a large version of your image and associated information.

We will be asking you to use PhotoCat to perform several photo-management tasks. These tasks will involve finding specific photos in your collection and possibly saving them as groups or sharing them with others.

Please "think out loud" while you perform your tasks, as it will help us understand your interaction with the interface. You can use your finger as your cursor in this experiment.

You are free to refuse to participate or quit the experiment at any time.

Before we start, we’d like you to read and sign this release that explains more about what this testing is all about. Give the participant a copy of the release for reading and signing.

Task Scenarios

Our participants completed four task scenarios. See below for details.

Debriefing

Ask the participant about the different aspects of the PhotoCat interface:

  • Bullseye
    • Circle design
    • People Petal icons
  • Photo Bin
  • Time
  • Location
  • Album
  • Friends
  • Actions
  • Popups

Other questions:

  • What was particularly easy about using the PhotoCat interface?
  • What was particularly difficult?
  • Have you used other photo management applications? Which ones?
  • How do they compare to the PhotoCat interface?

Ask the participant if they have any questions or comments. Thank them for taking the time to test the PhotoCat interface.

TOP

Task Scenarios

We designed our task scenarios so that they met the needs of our personas—especially Darla Garcia who uses photos flexibly to meet a broader variety of needs than some of the others. Each task we set for our paper-prototype interviewees has specific relevance. The relevance is broken down by task below:

1. Today is Monday and earlier in the day you went to a botanical garden. Your pictures automatically upload to the PhotoCat website when you take them. One of the pictures you took was a view of a pink rose. You want to see how this photo turned out so you need to find and view the large-size photo to be sure it’s not blurry. If it’s good you want to share it with a friend who loves roses.

Discussion: This task is especially relevant because all of our interviewees and personas mentioned viewing and sharing photos soon after they were taken. The task is the simplest of the four—to help our interviewees gain confidence using the paper-prototype system. The ideal results are that the photo needs to be found and shared very quickly with little effort. The task approximates the base task for Darla—that of finding good photos from earlier in the day and sharing them. In fact, it is even easier than her base task since only one photo needs to be viewed and shared.

2. You took some camera-phone pictures at a party on Friday. The party was held at your friend’s house in Oakland. Today is Monday and you’re at work. You want to browse through your party pictures and pick out the good ones to share with your friends who were there. Your photos were automatically uploaded to PhotoCat when they were taken on Friday.

Discussion: The second tasks adds some complexity to our testing that the first does not have. It asks the interviewee to find a photo from an event within the past 3 or 4 days and it includes information about the place for the event it mentions (Oakland). Since most personas organize things primarily by time, this task can be completed fairly easily since the time period is still recent. We desired to see if our interviewees would access the photos still primarily by time or also use the concept of place. The task scenario includes a party event in the description since our personas often recording some kind of event when taking photos. For instance, Darla was recording a kind of event with Mario’s first day of school, and Jake frequently documents parties. The task adds complexity by asking the user to share more than one picture with more than one person.

3. Last summer (July 2004), you and your family took a vacation to the Grand Canyon and other national parks. Now it is March, 2005, and you want to look back at your photos. You want to save the best ones (about 5) from the Grand Canyon.

Discussion: Task three moves the desired photos back further in time (to a family vacation last year). It requires the user to figure out how to access different time scales in the interface. The task was designed to see how people work when trying to deal with much longer time frames. The longer time view may present much more information and require the user to attempt other techniques to find and share the specific desired photos. The task is based on the persona of Steve Steep more than the other personas. It evaluates the sharing of a group of photos.

4. Your friend Steve visited you in Berkeley three weeks ago. He posed as a student and you took pictures of him and some pictures of the campanile. He asked you to share the pictures you took of him because he wants to use them on his Web site.

Discussion: The task deals with an intermediate time frame (within a month), specifically mentions a person (Steve) and also mentions a place (Berkeley). The task again requires the user to switch time scale (or filter by time scale) and additionally may allow easier access by filtering by people or place. Though most of our personas organized by time, some interviewees mentioned captioning or renaming photos based on the people in a photo. We wanted to see how interviewees accessed this intermediate time frame and find out if they used additional filtering in order to narrow the search. Again we asked them to select and share a group of photos. The task allowed filtering in many ways.

Test Measures

As shown in the paper prototype images below, the PhotoCat interface has many elements for the user to interact with. On the highest level, we were looking to see if our testers understood the relationship between the "Bullseye View," the "Photo Bin," and the "Filter Menus" portions of the screen. The Bullseye View was designed as the primary browsing interface allowing the user to see thumbnails of all of his or her collection during a specified time frame. The Photo Bin was designed as a holding area, allowing users to view selections of pictures and perform actions on them. The Filter Menus were designed as ways to decrease or increase the number of photos shown on the bullseye view.

Bullseye View

  • Does the user understand the logic of each of the time layouts (day view, week view, month view, year view, 5-year view)?
  • Can the user find a specific picture on the target?
  • Does the user understand what the bands on the target mean?
  • Can the user figure out how to move a picture from the target to the Photo Bin?

These questions were important to the team because although we understand the time centered target interface, we were not sure if it would be an understandable and logical information visualization tool for our testers.



Photo Bin

  • Does the user understand what the Photo Bin is for?
  • Does the user understand how to perform actions to the Photo Bin?
  • Does the user understand the relationship of the Photo Bin to the target?

Our team members have used the bin concept in other photo tools, and thought it was useful. We wanted to make sure that our testers understood the relationship of the Bullseye View to the bin, and what they could do with the pictures once they got them into the bin.




Filter Menus

  • Does the user understand the basic functionality of the Filter Menus?
  • Do they use more than the date function?
  • Do they understand that the actions grouping is supposed to be tied to the Photo Bin and not the target?

The panel that is the furthest right was used for filtering thumbnails on the target and performing actions to the pictures in the Photo Bin. It was important to see what the user did with each of the widgets, what they understood, what they misunderstood (suggesting we'd have to make changes), and what they didn’t use at all.

TOP

Next: Results and Discussion