HOME

Final Presentation
Final Prototype

Assignment #1
Project Proposal
Assignment #2
Project Personas
Goals
Task Analysis
Assignment #3
Scenarios
Comparative Analysis
Initial Design Sketches
Assignment #4
Low-fi Prototype
Usability Testing
Assignment #5
First Interactive Prototype
Assignment #6
Heuristic Evaluation
Assignment #7
Second Interactive Prototype
Assignment #8
Pilot Usability Study
Assignment #9
Final Write-Up
Individual Assignment
Krista Gettle
Diana Stepner
Project Resources
Work Distribution
 

Assignment #8

Introduction
Method
Test Measures
Results
Discussion
Formal Experiment Design
Appendix


Introduction

We have designed a tool, called MySIMS, that will allow students to customize their access to academic information at SIMS. It follows the web portal metaphor and would be used instead of the current SIMS or Cardea site (e.g. students would be presented with the MySIMS portal instead of the current UIs). The first time a user logs on they would be presented with a Welcome page. From here the user can decide to customize their instance or start using MySIMS directly. All users will be presented with four tabs - Home, Course, UCB, and News. Individuals who selected interests during the customization process will have a fifth tab - Interests. Common across all tabs are common navigational links to MySIMS, Preferences, Help, and Log Out. MySIMS is written in HTML.

To test our latest design, we developed a pilot usability study of an improved version of our second interactive prototype. We asked three users who represented the personas outlined in Assignment 2 to try to accomplish three typical tasks. Based on the outcome from the tests, we hope to determine if users are consistently able to perform the tasks, find the application easy to use as well as useful, and areas where we can make usability improvements.


Method

Participants
We selected our participants based on our personas. As potential users of our portal, they are representative of the audience of individuals we hope will benefit from the availability of MySIMS. All our participants are SIMS masters students.

Tester
Gender
Age
Background
1
  Female
27
1st year Masters student at SIMS 
2
 Male
26
2nd year Masters student at SIMS
3
 Female
29
2nd year Masters student at SIMS 

Apparatus
We tested all three of our participants in the SIMS downstairs computer lab. Each person used one of SIMS' desktop machines running Windows. The prototype was accessed through the version of Internet Explorer already installed.

Task Scenarios

Task 1: Setup Initial Content

  • Task Description: This is the first time you are using MySIMS. After logging-in, you are presented with a welcome screen. You agree to customize your instance of MySIMS. Ensure your existing demographic details and course information is correct. You are interested in HCI and Product / Project Management. Save your customizations.
  • Task Purpose: To discover what personal information the students would feel comfortable sharing as well as what they expected to happen after selecting specific interests and channels. We also wanted to test some terminology, specifically the word "channel".
  • Desired Steps:
    • Step 1: Login
    • Step 2: Choose to Customize
    • Step 3: Enter Profile Information
    • Step 4: Review Interests Tab
    • Step 5: Logout

Task Scenario #2 - Print course readings

  • Task Description: You are taking IS213 and an XML class. You forgot to print this week’s readings and need to access them from the syllabus.
  • Task Purpose: To see if students went to the Courses tab and understood the layout of the Courses channel. We also wanted to identify other elements the students expected to be find on the Courses tab as well as the desired method for viewing course announcements, readings, and homework due dates.
  • Desired Steps:
    • Step 1: Login
    • Step 2: Choose Not to Customize
    • Step 3: Navigate to Courses Tab
    • Step 4: Print Usability Assignment & XML Reading for Tuesday
    • Step 5: Logout

Task Scenario #3 - Add the Calendar channel to your Home tab

  • Task Description: You are interested in tracking your assignments via MySIMS. In order to do so, you need to add the Calendar channel. For quick viewing, you decide to add it to your Home tab.
  • Task Purpose: To determine how users expected to add a content channel to a tab. We wanted to see if they looked within the tab or navigated to the Preferences link. Also we were curious whether users would view the interactive preview and notice the content already included on the Home tab. Lastly were curious whether users would reorganize the channels after the new one was added.
  • Desired Steps:
    • Step 1: Login
    • Step 2: Navigate to Preferences Menu
    • Step 3: Select Channel to Add
    • Step 4: Select Location for Channel
    • Step 5: Confirm Location of Channel
    • Step 6: Validate Channel is Added
    • Step 7: Logout

Procedure

To ensure each participant had the same level of knowledge and introduction, we iterated through the following steps when conducting our usability tests.

  1. Introduce team members to participant.
  2. Have participant review and sign consent form.
  3. Explain purpose of the test.
  4. Introduce participant to MySIMS and give general directions on how it is used.
  5. Have participant attempt tasks.
  6. Have participant complete post-test evaluation and interview.

Test Measures

We captured reactions towards our prototype through a combination of observation techniques and feedback mechanisms, including "thinking aloud" and post-test questions. Of special interest was task completion navigation and error rate. The questions asked at the end of the testing sessions were designed to be provide insight that participants might not have provided in a verbal or physical manner.

Observations

During our observations, we focused on the following points. They were recommended as Testing Goals on the Usability.gov site.

  • Do users complete a task successfully?
  • If so, how fast do they do each task?
  • Is that fast enough to satisfy them?
  • What paths do they take in trying?
  • Do those paths seem efficient enough to them?
  • Where do they stumble? What problems do they have? Where do they get confused?
  • What words or paths are they looking for that are not now on the site?

Post-Test Questionnaire

In the post-test questionnaire testers identified their level of familiarity with the World Wide Web and portal websites. After these introductory questions, testers were asked to identify the difficulty of completing tasks as well as comment on the overall design and navigation. In addition open-ended questions were included to allow more freeform recommendations for improving the MySIMS portal.


Results

The following table summarizes the results gathered while observing users complete the usability testing tasks.

Task No.
Description - Task Step
Step Completed
Observations
Task Scenario #1 - Setup Initial Content
1
Step 1: Login
Y, Y, Y
Login was in a location they were familiar with.
1
Step 2: Choose to Customize
Y, Y, Y
Users did not read the text. Instead they followed the task 
1
Step 3: Enter Profile Information
N, Y, Y
"Interest In" course option confused users.
1
Step 4: Review Interests Lab
Y, Y, Y
Users liked being automatically brought to the Interests tab. Created a connection between their selections and how the information was used.
1
Step 5: Logout
Y, Y, Y
Logout was in a familiar location
Task Scenario #2 - Print course readings
2
Step 1: Login
Y, Y, Y
Login was in a location they were familiar with.
2
Step 2: Choose Not to Customize
Y, Y, Y
Users did not read the text. Instead they followed the task 
Step 3: Navigate to Courses Tab
Y, Y, Y
 Users had an easy time navigating to the Courses tab
Step 4: Print Usability Assignment & XML Reading for Tuesday
Y, Y, Y
 Usage of links was intuitive and what users expected
Step 5: Logout
Y, Y, Y
Logout was in a familiar location
Task Scenario #3 - Add the Calendar channel to your Home tab
3
Step 1: Login
Y, Y, Y
Login was in a location they were familiar with.
 3
Step 2: Navigate to Preferences Menu
Y, Y, Y
The term Preferences was clear to all the testers 
 3
Step 3: Select Channel to Add
Y, Y, Y
The incorrect label and options in the drop-down menus caused confusion, but users understood what needed to be done 
 3
Step 4: Select Location for Channel
N, Y, Y
Users wanted more visual indication of where the channel could be added - flashing, brighter color 
 3
Step 5: Confirm Location of Channel
N N, N
 Users expected selecting the channel's location to act as confirmation as well. So, this step seem unnecessary.
 3
Step 6: Validate Channel is Added
Y, Y, Y
Users understood the need to validate the location (e.g. save their changes)
 3
Step 7: Logout
Y, Y, Y
Logout was in a familiar location

Useful information was also gained through the responses to the post-test questionnaire. The following information identifies the answers we received as well as free form comments.

  1. Overall, I found the MySIMS portal easy to use.
    • Strongly Disagree
    • Disagree
    • Undecided
    • Agree - 2 testers
    • Strongly Agree - 1 tester
  2. Information was easy to find.
    • Strongly Disagree
    • Disagree
    • Undecided
    • Agree - 2 testers
    • Strongly Agree - 1 tester
  3. I would have organized the material differently.
    • Strongly Disagree
    • Disagree - 2 testers
    • Undecided - 1 tester
    • Agree
    • Strongly Agree
  4. The explanations and instructions on the screens were worded clearly.
    • Strongly Disagree
    • Disagree
    • Undecided
    • Agree - 3 testers
    • Strongly Agree
  5. I always knew where I was in the portal, and how to get back.
    • Strongly Disagree
    • Disagree
    • Undecided - 1 tester
    • Agree - 1 tester
    • Strongly Agree - 1 tester
  6. The colors were helpful when navigating through the application?
    • Strongly Disagree
    • Disagree
    • Undecided
    • Agree - 3 testers
    • Strongly Agree
  7. What did you like best about the MySIMS portal? Why?<
    • Tester 1: The calendar and incorporating homework / course information. However, I’d like to be able to access it when offline. The RSS feeds within a central location & with recommended feeds is convenient, plus the ability to add my own.
    • Tester 2: Aggregation of all my SIMS resources, readings, due dates, email, calendar in a centralized location.
    • Tester 3: Allows high degree of customization, no forced organization. Easy to change – will change automatically each semester
  8. What did you like least about the MySIMS portal? Why?
    • Tester 1: Display format of the channels - want it to be more like newsreader with folders. Would like more identification of how to add feeds within channels & longer timeframe view of news
    • Tester 2: Want more flexibility when working within a tab
    • Tester 3: Can’t change layout while in main application
  9. If you could change one thing about the MySIMS portal, what would it be? Why?
    • Tester 1: Make channel layout more of a RSS reader. Layout calendar by class information.
    • Tester 2: Not MySIMS necessarily, but want to ensure course information was standardized and could be accessible from within MySIMS
    • Tester 3: Calendar app would be bigger and have a full week. I’d like to be able to change views.
  10. Please add any additional comments that you feel will help us to improve the effectiveness of the MySIMS portal.
    • Additional comments were not provided

Discussion

The Pilot Usability Study gave us quick and constructive feedback on aspects of our interface which had been added or changed since the initial review sessions. The findings highlighted aspects which still need improvement as well as identified areas which are fine they we they are. We did learn that users expected all aspects of the prototype to work - specifically because it was designed in HTML. They seemed to have forgotten it was a prototype, so they tended to focus their comments on technical errors instead of design, functionality, and navigation. We did not face this issue when our prototype was still in PowerPoint. As a result, it might have been more beneficial to do additional interactions in PowerPoint before moving to HTML.

Subsequent Interface Changes

To address the feedback we received, the following modifications have been identified

 
Issue Recommendation
Calendar channel did not include Trash can icon (delete) and Minimize icon (double arrows)
Add the icons and ensure they are available on all the appropriate channels

Users expected entire channel to display after they had selected a location in the Preferences > Content

Change the steps for adding content. Remove the validation step. Have the channel appear once the user selects the desired location

Users were confused by the label of the first drop down in Preferences > Content. Its relationship to the second drop down was unclear

 

Change the label to "Select Channel Category". When this new name was run by testers, they understood its meaning. It implied a higher level, grouping of channels. This is correct and reflects the desired function.

Users expected to see actual values in the drop down menus in Preferences > Content

 

Add "real" data to both drop downs. Doing so would also help to reiterate the purpose of both drop down menus.

Even though having the ability to select courses they were "Interested In", users were unclear on how would they get more information on the course

 

A link to the UCB Course Catalog or SIMS Course listings could be included above the Interested In list box. If users have questions on a class, they can click the link. The information will appear in a pop-up. After finding out information on the course, they would close the pop-up.

 

Individuals were unclear what would happen if they clicked the trash can icon - would the channel be deleted or simply removed from view.

 

A confirmation message will be displayed after the user clicks the trash can icon. It will ask the user if they want to delete the channel from the tab. It will also highlight that the channel can be added back from within Preferences > Content

 

Users wanted to change the calendar view from within the Calendar Channel.

We envisioned users being able to change the calendar view after clicking the Open Calendar link. Instead the functionality will be moved back to the Calendar Channel. To manage space, the New Event (Quick Create) will be removed from the Calendar Channel and accessed from a link.

 

Users want to be able to access their calendar offline

A "Print" function will be added. It will allow users to print a copy of their calendar to their desktop or an actual printer. We will also evaluate calendar applications which support exchanges between web-based calendars and PCs or PDAs.

 

Users want to be able to access their email offline

Support the same functionality that SIMS mail has already - it allows users to access their email through PC-based Outlook and other email clients.

 

Users wanted to view more than one week of the syllabus

Allow the Course Readings & Assignments channel to scroll, so users can view more than one week. Or, allow additional weeks to be viewed after selected a View More link at the end of the Course Readings & Assignments channel.

 

Individuals expected course titles in the Course Resources channel to be links

Make the course titles in the Course Resources channel links. Clicking on a course title would bring up the course webpage in another window

 

Users were not sure how to enter their URL in the Personal Information section of Preferences > Profile.

 

Add http:// in front of the URL text book. See current My.SIMS for an example
Users wanted to add more than one phone number and IM address

Add additional phone fields for mobile, home, and other. Include labels to know which phone number is which. Also allow students to designate a primary number. This number would be visible to other students. Similar changes would be made to the IM field. Allow users to enter up to three IM addresses and designate a primary address.

 

Users wanted channels to be able to take up an entire tab

Provide functionality which "displaces" the channel from the portal and launches it in its own window.

 

 

Changes for "Real" Experiment

We felt we received very useful feedback during each usability test - including the evaluation of our first interactive prototype. As a result we believe our methods were effective. If we were performing a "real" experiment, we would continue testing our interface and iterate the design. We we try out multiple design variations in order to address some of the issues raised above. Also we would build out all of the tabs and functionality. Lastly, we would encourage testers to interact with the application without predefined tasks. Doing so would help to validate our design and navigation.


Formal Experiment Design

Hypotheses:
By modeling the customization of MySIMS after MyYahoo!, with the ability to edit content and color schemes separately, users will enjoy using MySIMS and find the experience to other web-based portals they have used.

Factors and Levels
The factor is the way in which the user chooses to interact with Preferences in MySIMS. The levels are C (current design - separation content and color scheme) and I (integrated design - combines content and color scheme).

The response variables are the number of errors and satisfaction. Errors were captured while observing the usability tests. Satisfaction was based on responses to the questions administered at the end of the usability testing sessions. We selected these variables because we hope users will find MySIMS a useful, enjoyable and familiar design. Combining content and presentation, instead of making them separate links under Preferences might be perceived as quicker, but may not lead to a more confusing - consequently more error prone - experience.

Blocking and Repetitions
The experiment will follow a within groups design. It will include 9 potential users: 3 students representing Clara's persona, 3 students representing Thomas' persona, and 3 students representing Isaac's persona. Each participant will be asked to do 4 exploratory tasks, each involving some interaction with the factors we want to test. There will be 3 groups of 3 participants (1 "Clara", 1 "Thomas", and 1 "Isaac"). The tasks will be varied between the groups to prevent a learning effect.

 


Appendix

Test Script (.doc)
Post Test Questionnaire (.doc)
Usability Tester 1 - Observations (.doc), Questionnaire (.doc)
Usability Tester 2 - Observations (.doc), Questionnaire (.doc)
Usability Tester 3 - Observations (.doc), Questionnaire (.doc)