Assignment #2
Team Management Structure
Revised Problem Statement Justification and Development of Personas and Goals
Personas and Goals
Necessary and Optional Tasks
Work Distribution
Appendices - Questionnaire and Interviews
Team Management
Structure
Team Member |
Role |
Mukesh Darke |
User Research Manager
Technical Design Manager |
Krista Gettle |
Visual Design Manager
Testing and Evaluation
Manager |
Diana Stepner |
Project Manager
Information/Navigational Design Manager |
Revised Problem Statement
Our team is a developing a tool that will allow students to
customize their access to academic information at SIMS. Currently,
many user communities - students, faculty, prospective students,
potential employers,
and the general public, utilize the public and password protected
web interfaces to access information on the SIMS web site. While
the site contains a wealth
of information, much of the power is lost because individuals
cannot navigate or customize the contents to meet their needs.
In the absence of these capabilities,
people create methods for tracking relevant academic information,
such as course web site locations and graduation requirements,
outside of the SIMS
infrastructure. These personalized methods make it difficult
to assess the resources students utilize during their academic
career. If more standardized
ways of subscribing to information flows existed, students' use
patterns could help establish a dialogue between those who utilize
SIMS' academic
resources and those who provide them. We see utilizing a different
interface model as a starting point for addressing these issues.
Justification
and Development of Personas and Goals
Based on our experience with the SIMS coursework and informal
discussions with first year students, we identified students’ usage
of course content being influenced by three factors: technical
expertise, professional experience, and career certainty. We
thought technical expertise or comfort with a command line
environment would influence individuals' interest and likelihood
to use web based tools. We expected students with professional
experience would have encountered Intranets and other content
or knowledge management systems and therefore have certain
expectations of navigation and customization. Whereas students
without a clear career direction would want to easily browse
materials by subject as a way to gauge interesting opportunities.
These were our initial assumptions about users' expectations
and we used these factors to identify interview candidates.
To refine our views and understand how students use SIMS’ academic
information, we developed a questionnaire. It focused on information
use, information navigation, information classification, information
communication, and general usage of the SIMS web site. (See
the complete list of interview questions).
We interviewed five SIMS students - two first-year and three
second-year Masters’ students. Both first-years have
technical backgrounds. One worked for a few years developing
applications and came to SIMS with a distinct purpose. The
other has very little professional experience and is still
undecided about what he hopes to do after SIMS. All three second
years worked prior to coming to SIMS, two extensively, and
were skilled but did not perceive themselves to be technical “experts”.
One knew exactly her course of study upon entry at SIMS while
the other two were undecided. Of the two “undecided” second-years,
one defined a clear path after completing the core courses.
The other remains undecided and is taking a wide range of classes
to find a direction before graduating.
After the interviews, we analyzed our findings. We found the
results differed from our initial assumptions. The factors
we identified at the start of the process (technical expertise,
professional experience, and career certainty) did not have
a strong impact on usage of SIMS course information. Instead
the students’ general attitude towards information provided
electronically was the overriding influence. For example, one
of the first-year students is so ardent about all forms of
electronic information that he placed his “whole life
is online”. He did so to allow others to quickly find
and communicate with him. It was due to this interview, as
well as informal conversations with a similar student, that
we developed our persona, Thomas N. Gibson.
The answers presented by the “undecided” first-year
closely matched those we received from two of the second-year
students. All of them are interested in receiving information
electronically but only access sources they can get to quickly
and easily. As a result, they have added course web sites to
their browser “Favorites” or personal site and
use these links to review readings and due dates. Two of the
second-year interviewees are interested in HCI and wished they
had more insight into activities going on outside SIMS. All
of our interviewees expressed a need for a centralized place
to manage academic requirements and deadlines. In fact, two
of the students we spoke with had nearly missed a due date
required for graduation. We combined the results from these
interviews to form our primary persona, Clara Filo.
The answers we received from the third second-year student
differed sufficiently from our other interviewees that we felt
another persona needed to be created. After reviewing the online
course catalog to identify the classes she wanted to take,
she did not revisit the course information on the SIMS web
site. frequently. Instead she tended to memorize assignment
due dates
and would hear about changes to the schedule either in class
or from classmates. She also preferred course readings in printed
format. We found it interesting that her preferences for managing
information were not a reflection of her comfort with technology.
She is adept with a number of online tools to access and classify
information; however she did not see the need to use any electronic
gadget or site to manage her academic pursuits at SIMS or related
interests. We also discussed her usage of course information
with a student who expressed similar patterns of behavior.
His input supported her comments and helped us to develop our
third persona, Isaac Einstein.
Personas
and Goal
Thomas
N. Gibson:
Information Addict |
Thomas' entire
life is can be found online
Thomas is 27 years-old.
He grew up in Silicon Valley. His dad, Steve, was one of the
original employees at Apple. He worked there for a number of
years before founding a successful software company. Thomas admires
his dad and hopes to start his own company someday. After earning
a BS in Computer Science from Stanford, Thomas went to work at
Wired Digital.
Thomas was the go-to-guy for anything perl or PHP related and managed
Wired's online communities. In his spare time he supports his gadget
habit by doing as much web work as he can get, uses open source
tools, and spends way too many hours reading news feeds from people
and information providers he trusts. His blog helps him keep-in-touch
with friends. They put pressure on each other to have their sites
current, so he uses scripts to make automatic updates.
He believes it takes an understanding of both business and technical
concepts to run a company. Because he plans to be a CEO by the
time he is 30, Thomas applied to graduate school. He chose SIMS
because his interests change quickly, and SIMS seemed to be one
of the broadest and most forward thinking schools. At the start
of the semester, he used the SIMS web site. to research courses.
After that, he simply added links to cardea, MySims, Telebears,
and the library to his site. Doing so meant he missed out on announcements
posted on the SIMS homepage.
Goals:
Use open source technologies for as many
parts of his life as possible
Add new feeds to his reader without having to break the
flow of his current activities
Identify information
by specific people, groups, and publishing organizations he respects
|
Clara
Filo: Information as an Enhancement |
Clara's interests
are diverse and many.
Clara is 29 years old. She grew up in San Mateo and went to UC Berkeley for her undergraduate degree. She majored in Economics but wanted to do something more creative when she graduated. She had some friends in Computer Science and Communications, so she took a few classes in their departments and started to learn HTML before graduating.
Clara worked as a Media Planner in a San Francisco-based ad agency.
On one account, she teamed-up with members of the Creative department.
She was inspired to take another HTML course and a Java class at
UC Berkeley Extension. After losing a few big accounts, Clara's
agency closed its doors. She thought about joining another firm,
but she wanted to find a more stable field. Uncertain what to do
next, Clara researched graduate programs at Berkeley. She wanted
to be near her friends and family and found the diverse aspects
of SIMS appealing. But, she was apprehensive. Clara did not want
to be the only one without a CS undergrad or feel overwhelmed.
She read everything about the school, courses, and jobs people
had beforehand. She emailed a few students. Their responses made
her feel comfortable, and she applied.
After completing her first year of coursework,
Clara had yet to identify a specialty. She found HCI, document
engineering, and
multimedia fascinating. She thought the degree tracks might help
her to focus her interests, but she heard a number of the classes
weren't being offered. She spent some time online researching each
area and realized how important it is to keep up with certain groups
on campus. She has great ideas for using all of the information
she's found at SIMS, if only she had the time to pull all of the
resources together. Then again, Clara lives a hectic life and rarely
has the time to do more than make bookmarks for her class web sites
Goals:
Keep-in-the-know about general topics of interest
Use her SIMS web site. to reflect her individuality
Access course web sites quickly,
frequently, and easily
|
Necessary
and Optional Tasks
Tasks: Thomas N. Gibson
Task |
Frequency |
Importance |
Details |
Setup Content |
Often |
High |
- Identify relevant topics of interest
- Research sources (optional)
- Review feedback (optional)
- Configure default format and frequency
at source
- Configure local means for accessing information
|
View Content |
Often |
High |
- Go to or receive new content whenever
new information is posted
- View specific item of content
- Discard content or retain for
later viewing
|
Update Information Sources |
Rarely |
Medium |
- Review existing sources of information
- Decide to archive
or retain for future reference
- Modify settings - frequency, source, format,
etc. (optional)
|
Develop custom tools (Optional) |
Rarely |
Low |
- Identify source that needs modification
- Identify technical solution
- Encode solution in given technology
|
Tasks: Clara Filo
Task |
Frequency |
Importance |
Details |
Setup Initial Content |
Sometimes |
High |
- Identify relevant topics of interest
- Research sources (optional)
- Review feedback (optional)
- Configure default format and frequency at
source
- Configure local means for accessing information
|
View Content |
Often |
High |
- Go to or receive new content whenever new
information is posted
- View specific item of content
- Discard content or retain for later viewing
|
Update Existing Content |
Rarely |
Low |
- Review existing sources of information
- Decide to delete, archive or retain for
future reference
|
Customize Presentation (Optional) |
Rarely |
Medium |
- Identify source that can be modified
- Identify preferences to customize
- Customize preferences - frequency, source, format,
etc. (optional)
|
Tasks: Isaac Einstein
Task |
Frequency |
Importance |
Details |
Setup Initial Content |
Rarely |
High |
- Identify relevant topics of interest
- Research sources (optional)
- Review feedback (optional)
- Configure default format and frequency
at source
- Configure local means for accessing information
|
View Content |
Often |
High |
- Go to or receive new content whenever
new information is posted
- View specific item of content
- Discard content or retain for later viewing
|
Update Information Sources |
Rarely |
Low |
- Review existing sources of information
- Decide to delete, archive or retain for
future reference
|
Customize Presentation (Optional) |
Rarely |
Low |
- Identify source that can be modified
- Identify preferences to customize
- Customize preferences -
frequency, source, format, etc. (optional)
|
Appendices
Interview
Template (.doc)
Interview #1 - First
Year, Professional Experience, Decided Focus (.doc)
Interview #2 - Second Year, Professional Experience,
Decided Focus (.doc)
Interview #3 - Second Year, Little Professional Experience,
Undecided Focus (.doc)
Interview #4 - Second
Year, Professional Experience, Decided Focus (.doc)
Interview #5 - First Year, Little Professional Experience,
Undecided Focus (.doc)
|