Proposal
Comparative
Analysis
>>
Audience Assessment
Schedule
Budget
Executive Summary
Mohammed
Shamma
Rick
Murtha
Jennifer
Lee
|
Audience Assessment
Customer Profile
Location: people who need location information for
cities (greater metro areas)
Lifestyle: on the move, busy, juggling multiple responsibilities,
travel
Situation: people unfamiliar with a particular geographical
area (eg. Tourists, business travelers, prospective residents, new residents,
prospective business owners), people comfortable with the online world.
Age: 15 and up
Income bracket: on the Internet it would be the same
as the online population, for stand-alone implementations, it would
be much broader, eg. a ULP on a plane would attend to the needs of air
travelers.
Gender: Not gender targeted.
Implementation
Justification: People are very visually oriented. Textual
information is useful to a point for many, but people like a graphical
representation of information in order to better orient themselves.
Mapping takes this a step further by providing geographical context.
This is the usefulness of GIS. The ULP would utilize a GIS as the basis
of its implementation. However, as mentioned in our mission statement,
the ULP would go above and beyond the basic functionality of mapping
sites currently available.
Implementation: Two possible implementations of the
ULP are a standard Internet site (www.ULP.com)
and stand-alone implementations. One specific example of the former
would entail linking the home site to portal sites such as search engines.
Some specific examples of the latter might be:
- Kiosks on the street;
- Cars (such as the Acura TL’s satellite navigation system).
- Portal sites (as a new utility on search engine sites);
- Airplanes
- Hotels
- Car rental agencies
Customers/Consumers
It is often the case that one’s customers and one’s consumers
are not one and the same. For example, parents buy diapers and babies
consume them. The case of the ULP is similar. Some prospective customers
are search engines, municipal governments and community-based services.
However, it would be individual consumers accessing the service. Search
engines, for example, would pay dearly to link to the ULP if they could
cover their costs by justifying higher advertising rates to their advertisers.
Problem Solved
The ULP’s usefulness arises from its ability to reduce the disorientation
people unfamiliar with a particular area feel. The various mapping/locator
sites currently available are domain specific, ie. they address only
ATMs for example. The ULP solves a problem by providing convenience
of use all on one site. By having a ULP, user would no longer need
to bookmark five, ten or even twenty different single-purpose locator
sites. So, why can’t somebody simply create a site linking existing
locators? They can and do, but they do not provide a uniform user
interface.
|