Outline for Affirmative Position
(Force cable companies to open up to ISPs)
- Policy Goals for Maximizing Public Benefit
- Lower Prices
- Broader Access
- Variety of Services
- Quality of Service
Why competition important
Monopolies traditionally charge relatively high prices and serve only a portion of the potential market.
Competition among ISPs will reduce prices for Internet access service closer to cost.
Lower prices will enable a broader section of the population to purchase service.
Historical Example of mandated competition driving down prices:
- ‘96 Telecommunications Act allows for new CLECs to offer intra-state long distance.
- Price of intra-state phone calls has dropped
DSL vs. Cable Competition
The two solutions tend to develop in isolated pockets
so consumers rarely have both.
- $40 per month vs. $60
- Therefore, likely to become dominant technology for the
"masses"
Cable Industry has large momentum
- AT&T planning to spend $5.7bn on TCI network upgrades
- Industry planning to spend $10bn in ‘99 on upgrades
Pace of Infrastructure Build-out will actually be
hastened
Cable company and largely owned ISP partner assumes
both the marketing and build-out costs (and hence risks) when
introducing service to an area.
- Risk of not getting high enough number of subscriptions to cover
investment
Cable company manages this risk by building out slowly
In new model, ISPs will assume the cost of marketing
- ISPs have a stake in subscription rate
- ISPs are famous for their aggressive marketing
Result: Primary demand nationwide stimulated
Assured of strong demand, Cable companies will rapidly expand
service to new areas
Variety
- AT&T wants to be your big brother
- $57 billion to buy TCI
- $54 billion to buy Media One
- Danger of having one monolithic content provider
- Multiple ISPs will give consumers choice of content
- Picture the world with one TV station!
- Competition will spur innovation in Internet services
- Video telephony
- Video on demand
- ISP Competition will lead to Higher Quality Service
- CATV monopolies infamous for providing bad service.
- Pre-Telecommunications Act telecos (RBOCs) notorious for providing
bad service and high price.
Click here to go back to the
Project 2 Table of Contents