BE A SUBJECT IN A DIARY STUDY

 

You are going to log your information activity for one day. 

 

See the descriptions of the 2 actual studies on the next page.  Decide whether you want to log your activity using (1) a paper log (here's the form) or (2) a camera (the latter works best if you have a cameraphone or a small digital camera).

 

For one day, follow the instructions for the study you choose to participate in. 

Keep your log and/or pictures; we'll use them in the next part of this assignment.

Do this one day during the week of Sept 26.

 

 

The point of this is for you to practice being a subject in a diary study.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
DIARY STUDY 1

Fifteen subjects were asked to log their daily information capture whenever during the course of each day they felt the need to "capture" some information either at work or at home  ….Further, we asked them to estimate the duration of each activity and to note this down on their log forms. 

At the end of each day, an interviewer used a structured form in order to expand on the  description of each activity and to note down more details such as what types of documents

were used, whether the activity was collaborative, where the activity occurred, and what additional tools were used.

 Adapted fro Adler et al. 1998

 

 

DIARY STUDY 2

This study used a diary methodology which was a modification of previous methods we have used. Instead of asking subjects to keep written notes on their activities, we

asked them to take photographs of the events we were interested in. We equipped subjects with digital cameras to use over the course of 7 consecutive days (covering on average 5 working days and 2 days at home). Subjects in both groups were asked to use the camera whenever during the course of each day they felt the need to "capture" some information either at work or at home. It was emphasized that they should use the camera as a diary tool rather than as a conventional camera. They were told to take a picture whenever they actually captured some information in the course of their day, or whenever they would have liked to have captured information but did not have the means.

 

Subjects  were told we were interested in opportunities to capture any kind of information they came across - be it spoken or ambient sound,  document-based information (paper or electronic), moving image, or scenes.

 

The pictures themselves were used later as illustrations and as memory joggers in semi-structured interviews intended to unpack the context surrounding each

capture event. Subjects were interviewed three times over the week, and asked in detail about each photograph they had taken. For each photograph, they were asked a number

of different questions including:

• What did they and how ideally would they have captured the information?

• How did they or how would they have used the information they captured?

• Did they share or did they want to share the captured information?

• Did they or would they have wanted to keep the captured information?

Adapted from (Brown, Sellen, & O'Hara, 2000)

 

 

Brown, B. A. T., Sellen, A. J., & O'Hara, K. p. (2000). A diary study of information capture in working life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 438-445). New York: ACM Press.http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/332040.332472

Adler, A., Gujar, A., Harrison, B. L., O'Hara, K., and Sellen, A. 1998. A diary study of work-related reading: design implications for digital reading devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Los Angeles, California, United States, April 18 - 23, 1998). C. Karat, A. Lund, J. Coutaz, and J. Karat, Eds. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 241-248  DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/274644.274679