[an error occurred while processing this directive] |
The following illustration
shows the entry page for Craigslist:
Pros:
- For bulletin
board function, provides direct access to all topics, as well as showing
their organization into forums.
- Provides direct
access to search, FAQ, posting, and other functions.
- The geographic
area currently selected is prominently displayed.
Cons:
- Page appears
busy and cluttered. User must scroll to see all forums/topics.
- Although access
to bulletin boards is clearly "central", the arrangement of other
options seems arbitrary (i.e., it does not obviously reflect their
importance, permanence, frequency of use, or likely sequence).
- One topic (Community
potpourri) is "hidden" inside the forum heading. None of the other
forum headings are links.
- Pull down menu
and links to select geographic location are redundant. Because neither
navigation option is labeled, it is not immediately obvious that these
are the same thing.
- Although the
search function is shown on the entry page, it is restricted to searching
within a selected forum. The user may reasonably expect a "search
all" function since search appears at the top level and is labeled
"search craigslist".
Interestingly, there
is no intermediate display layer at the forum level (between the entry
page and the lists of individual topics), even though the entry page's
search capability is at the forum level.
Selecting a bulletin
board topic takes you directly to a list of message headers, organized
by date. Searching (either from the entry page or from the topic-level
page) also displays a list of message headers, similar in content but
different in layout. The following two illustrations show a list of
messages as selected from the entry page and as obtained by a search,
respectively.
Pros
- Search results
page provides a clear mechanism for horizontal access to other bulletin
boards as well as return to entry page.
- An interesting
range of search filtering options are provided.
- The search function
has been thoughtfully designed in terms of the options provided for
a given forum. For instance, while each forum allows a combination
of user-entered search terms, geographic area, and topic, the jobs
forum also provides a set of check-boxes for specific types of jobs
(telecommute, contract, etc.).
Cons
- Inconsistencies
between the two pages seem arbitrary and accidental (rather than serving
the purpose of differentiating the two locations). These inconsistencies
include: Background color, available navigation options, position
and labeling of link to entry page, available search options (e.g.,
option to select a different geographic area), and format of message
headers (e.g., how location is specified, where date is shown).
- Count of listed
messages is not accurate.
- Messages may
be listed multiple times, and may appear on the list even after being
deleted (the user only learns the message has been deleted by trying
to read it).
The text of an individual
message may be viewed by selecting an item from the list.
Pros
- Navigation options
are consistently provided for returning to entry page and returning
to the message list. These "bread-crumbs" are presented in format
which reflects the heirarchical organization of the material.
- A full page is
devoted to the text of each message. This works well in the bulletin
board context, although it might not work in a discussion forum context
(and indeed, the discussion forum area of Craigslist handles this
somewhat differently, as shown below).
Cons
- Sometimes an
option is provided to move to the next item in the list, but not always
(it is not clear when or why).
- Format of link
to entry page is not consistent with other displays.
- The purpose of
the "flag for review" option is not clear, and is not explained in
the FAQ.
The discussion forum
section of Craigslist, shown below, is separate from the bulletin boards,
and is accessed from a single link on the entry page.
Pros
- All discussion
forums can be accessed from this single page.
- For each forum,
both a clear title and an extract from the forum's introductory text
are displayed.
Cons
- In a few cases,
the extracted introductory text is somewhat cryptic (e.g., is 'Transportation
Issues' really all about motorcyles?).
- It is not initially
clear why the blank, unlabeled frame on the right is displayed.
- The heading/link
labeled "discussions" is a circular link to this page.
- The link to the
Craigslist entry page is inconsistent (in labelling and/or location)
with those used in the bulletin board area.
When a specific
discussion forum is selected, a display containing the introductory
text for that forum and a list of threaded message headers is displayed:


Indentation is used
to indicate threads of replies beneath an original message. This can
get quite deep and complex, as shown below:

Pros
- Indentation provides
additional information about the context of a particular reply.
Cons
- It can be difficult
(or impossible) to locate a specific message to check for replies.
There is no search capability within the discussion forums.
- After scrolling
down, no navigation options are provided (e.g., to go to the next
page) without scrolling to the top again.
- No option is
provided to "compress" areas or depth within the threaded discussion.
For instance, when searching for replies to a specific original message,
it would be very helpful to view only original messages, not the full
(and sometime elaborate) threads underneath each original message.
Selecting a specific
message displays that message in the right-hand frame:
Pros
- Options to reply
or start a new thread are provided.
- Message text
can be viewed simultaneously with indented list showing thread context.
Cons
- For a long message,
it would be necessary to scroll down to see the reply option.
- The indented
list display does not highlight which message is currently being viewed.
- There is no option
to view the "next" message.
The form for posting
a message (in this case, a new thread) is shown below, along with the
result of selecting the preview option:
Pros
- The form is simple,
clear, and easy to use.
Cons
- Composition and
Preview windows do not provide a "cancel" option.
|