SCHEDULE |
Date |
Reading |
Discussion
Leader(s) |
Jan
26 |
Landon
Winner, Do Artifacts Have Politics? http://www-personal.si.umich.edu/~rfrost/courses/Women+Tech/readings/Winner.html
Paul Dourish,
Where the Action Is, ch. 3: Social Computing. Available online
via UCB library at http://uclibs.org/PID/17642.
(You need to be using a machine on campus or come through Library
Proxy. I needed to update my Acrobat Reader for this to display properly.)
|
Yuri
Stephen |
Feb.
2
TODAY
ONLY:
time changed: 10-12:30; room changed: 205SH
107
SH |
Mizuko
Ito, Personal Portable Pedestrian: Lessons from Japanese Mobile Phone
Use http://www.itofisher.com/mito/archives/ito.ppp.pdf
Okabe,
Daisuke. Emergent
Social Practices, Situations and Relations through Everyday Camera Phone
Use.
Recommended:
Mizuko
Ito and Daisuke Okabe. Technosocial Situations: Emergent Structurings
of Mobile Email Use
http://www.itofisher.com/mito/mobileemail.pdf
Other papers:
http://itofisher.com/mito/publications.html
Mimi Ito
will meet with us when she arrives in Berkeley - probably 11:30 or so. |
Morgan |
Feb.
9
SCOT |
This
week we'll focus on understanding what SCOT is; this topic will continue
into next week.
Bijker,
W. E. (2004) Technology,
Social Construction of. International Encyclopedia of the Social
& Behavioral Sciences. (requires campus IP address
or proxy)
Bijker,
W. E. (1995). King of the road: the social construction of the safety
bicycle. In Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of
sociotechnical change (pp. 19-100). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (copies
outside my office; long, but read it for SCOT, not for the details on
bicycles)
Pinch,
T. (1996). The social construction of technology: a review. In R.Fox (Ed.),
Technological change (pp. 17-35). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
(copies outside my office)
Ronald Kline; Trevor Pinch.
Users as Agents of Technological Change: The Social Construction of the
Automobile in the Rural United States Technology and Culture,
Vol. 37, No. 4. (Oct., 1996), pp. 763-795. (requires campus IP address
or proxy)
Recommended:
Rosen, P. (1993). The
social construction of mountain bikes: technology and postmodernity in
the cycle industry. Social Studies of Science, 23, 479-513.
(requires campus IP address or proxy)
Trevor
J. Pinch; Wiebe E. Bijker. The
Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science
and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other ; Social
Studies of Science ,Vol. 14, No. 3 (Aug., 1984), pp. 399-441 |
Matti
and Tracey |
Feb.
16
| Continue
discussion of SCOT:
- review readings
from last week
- come
prepared to discuss Kline and Pinch
- Find
examples of SCOT related to topics in your own domain/interests and
come to class prepared to discuss
|
|
Feb.
23 |
Selection
from Hacking, The Social Construction of What? |
|
March
2 |
Lave,
J., Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, England, 1991.
chs. 1, 2, 4, 5 Available as PDF on the wiki. |
Megan,
Dan, Steve |
March
9 |
Suchman,
L. A. Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human-Machine Communication.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
chs 1-4, 8.
The following
all available online via the library using campus IP address or proxy:
Suchman,
2003. Reading and Writing: A response to comments on Plans and Situated
Actions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 2:
299-306.On
the wiki; available via campus library.
Possibly
useful - re discussion of identity from last week's class:
Figuring
Personhood in Sciences of the Artificial Lucy Suchman, 2004.
Plus skim these
others - comments on P&SA:
Plans
and Situated Actions: A Retro-Review
Timothy Koschmann
Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 2: pages 257-258.
Plans
and Situated Action Ten Years On
Wes Sharrock, Graham Button
Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 2: pages 259-264.
Lesson
Plans and Situated Learning-and-Teaching
Gordon Wells
Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 2: pages 265-272.
Situated
Action in the Zeitgeist of Human-Computer Interaction
John M. Carroll
Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 2: pages 273-278.
By the
Seat of Our Pants: The Evolution of Research on Cognition and Action
Alonso H. Vera
Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 2: pages 279-284.
Representations
That Depend on the Environment: Interpretative, Predictive, and Praxis
Perspectives on Learning
Daniel L. Schwartz, Taylor Martin
Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 2: pages 285-297.
|
|
March
16 |
Activity
Theory
Activity
theory is referred to a lot in the HCI lit but with, I think, only a superificial
understanding. Our goal will be to
thoroughly understand AT, how it has been used/misused in HCI, and how
it can be used.
Start with:
Kaptelinin, Victor, and Nard, Bonnie A. Activity
Theory: Basic Concepts and Applications. CHI 97 workshop.
Liam Bannon, Activity
Theory , 1997
Then read:
Nardi,
B. (1996). Activity theory and human-computer interaction(pp. 7-16); and
Kuutti, K. (1996).Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer
interaction (pp. 17-44). Both In B.Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness:
activity theory and human-computer interaction . Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press. (on
the wiki)
FYI-
other useful readings:
Patricia Collins, Shilpa Shukla, David Redmiles.Activity
Theory and System Design: A View from the Trenches. Computer Supported
Cooperative Work 11: 55-80, 1999.
Engeström,Yrjo.
Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective.
Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8: 63–93, 1999.
Gay, G.,
Hembrooke, H. Activity-Centered Design: an Ecological Approach to Designing
Smart Tools and Usable Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2004
Christine A. Halverson (2002). Activity
Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories?
Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11: 243-267.
Star, S.
L. (1996). Working together: Symbolic interactionism, activity theory,
and information systems. In D.Middleton & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Cognition
and communication at work (pp. 296-318). Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge
University.
|
|
March
23 |
Spring
Break |
|
March
30 |
Distributed
Cognition
James Hollan,
Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh . Distributed
cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Volume 7
, Issue 2 (June 2000) (ACM Dig Lib - accessible from UC IP addresses)
Hutchins, E & Klausen, T. (1996) Distributed
cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton
(Eds.) Cognition and communication at work. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Christine A. Halverson (2002). Activity
Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories?
Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11: 243-267.
Also look
at:
Nardi, Studying Context: a Comparison of Activity, Theory, Situated Action
Models, and Distributed Cognition. In Nardi, ed., Context and Consciousness,
p. 69-102. Copied and handed out during March 16 class. (Part of the copying
that Megan did during the break.) |
|
April
6 |
no
class - CHI conference. |
|
April
13 |
Christine
A. Halverson (2002). Activity
Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories?
Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11: 243-267.
Star, S.
L. (1996). Working together: Symbolic interactionism, activity theory,
and information systems. In D.Middleton & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Cognition
and communication at work (pp. 296-318). Cambridge ; Cambridge University
Press. I'll make a copy available for scanning for the wiki.
Not the
paper I was thinking of but checking Y. Rogers' site I found the following:
Rogers, Y. (2004) New
Theoretical approaches for Human-Computer Interaction. Annual Review
of Information, Science and Technology, 38, 87-143. Covers AT, DCog, and
more.
This is the ANT paper but we won't try
to discuss it today:
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy,
and heterogenity.
http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-notes-on-ant.pdf |
|
April
20 |
Social
scientists and design:
Lucy Suchman (2000), Located
Accountabilities in Technology Production
|
|
April
27 |
Social
Scientists and Design (cont)
Suchman, L. A., Blomberg, J., Orr, J. E., & Trigg, R. H. (1999).
Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral
Scientist, 43, 392-408. Overview of their work. On the wiki.
I may add one more article. 4/21/05
Recommended:
Suchman, L. (2000). Embodied Practices of Engineering Work. Mind,
Culture, and Activity, 7, 4-18. Activity theory and ethnomethodology.
On the wiki.
Actor-Network Theory
(we'll continue this into next week -- begin with these)
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of
the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogenity.
http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/sociology/papers/law-notes-on-ant.pdf
For an example of ANT in action: Law, J. (1992). On the Methods of Long-Distance
Control: Vessels, Navigation, and the Portuguese Route to India. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/sociology/papers/law-methods-of-long-distance-control.pdf
FYI:
Actor-Network Resource |
|
May
4 |
Latour,
B. J. J. (1995). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of
door-closer. In S.L.Star (Ed.), Ecologies of knowledge: work and politics
in science and technology (pp. 257-277). SUNY Press. Also published in
Social Problems, Vol. 35, No. 3, Special Issue: The Sociology of Science
and Technology, Jun., 1988 (available online via campus - on wiki)
Recap, review, wrap-up
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANT recommended:
Callon,
M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops
and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Law J. (ed.). Power, Action, and
Belief: a New Sociology ofKnowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul: London,
1986.
Star, S. L. & Griesmer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations,"
and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum
of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19,
387-420. (will be made available)
Optional - FYI:
Bowker, G. C. & Star, S. L. (1996).
How things (actor-net)work:
Classification, magic and the ubiquity of standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actor-Network
Theory
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory
of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogenity.
http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-notes-on-ant.pdf
For an example of ANT in action: Law, J. (1992). On the Methods of Long-Distance
Control: Vessels, Navigation, and the Portuguese Route to India. http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-methods-of-long-distance-control.pdf
Callon, M. Some elements of a sociology
of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St.
Brieuc Bay. In Law J. (ed.). Power, Action, and Belief: a New Sociology
of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul: London, 1986. (will be made
available)
Bowker, G. C. & Star, S. L. (1996).
How things (actor-net)work:
Classification, magic and the ubiquity of standards.
J. Johnson [Bruno Latour] (1995): “Mixing
Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer”
in Susan Leigh Star (ed.): Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics
in Science and Technology. pp. 257-277.
Kaghan, W. N. and Bowker, G. C. Crossing
boundaries and building bridges: Irreductionist '"frameworks"
for the study of sociotechnical systems. Journal of Engineering and
Technology Management, 18 (2001) 253-269.
Star, S. L. & Griesmer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations,"
and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum
of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science,
19, 387-420.
|
Context
There's lots of agreement that
context is important in IT design and use, but then things get confusing:
what is context and how does it get incorporated in design?
Dourish, P. What
we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous
Computing 8, 1 (2004) 19-30.:
Anind K. Dey and Gregory D. Abowd. Towards
a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness. In the Workshop
on The What, Who, Where, When, and How of Context-Awareness, as part
of the 2000 Conference on Human Factors inComputing Systems (CHI 2000),
The Hague, The Netherlands, April 3, 2000. ftp://ftp.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gvu/tr/1999/99-22.pdf
Focused on representation from an actionable/computational perspective
(rather than a descriptive or analytical one).
Abowd and Mynatt. "Charting Past,
Present and Future Research in Ubiquitous Computing" TOCHI 7(1),
2000. pp. 29-58.
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fce/pubs/tochi-millenium.pdf Chris says:
This is a fairly decent outline of the ubiquitous computing agenda.]
|
Critical Technical
Practice
Agre, P. (1997). Toward a critical technical
practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In G.C.Bowker, S.
L. Star, W. Turner, & L. Gasser (Eds.), Social science, technical
systems, and cooperative work (pp. 131-158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc. online
version
Wardrip-Fruin, M. & Moss, B. (2002).
The impermance agent: Project and context. PAJ: A Journal of Performance
and Art, 70, 52-83. Read pp. 69-71 on CTP. pdf
See a page
listing people associated with CTP
Read as examples of CTP:
Philip E. Agre, Writing and Representation.
From Michael Mateas and Phoebe Sengers, eds, Narrative Intelligence,
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002.
online version
Philip E. Agre. Cyberspace as American
Culture Science as Culture 11(2), 2002, pages 171-189. pdf
version.
|
Distributed
Cognition
Like AT, this is an approach talked about
in HCI but with, I suspect, often only a superficial understanding. Our
goal will be to understand how it is used and can be used understanding
and designing IT, and its relationship to the other approaches discussed.
|
Gender and Technology
These are examples -- need to
do more digging around to decide what we would read.
Wajcman, J. (2000). Reflections on gender
and technology studies: In what state is the art? Social Studies of
Science, 30, 447-464.
Haraway, D. (2003). Situated knowledges:
The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.
Feminist Studies, 14, 575-600.
McLauglin, J. (2002). Gendering the
user and technological innnovation. In International Summer Academy
on Technological Studies: User Involvement in Technological Innovation
(pp. 115-127).
|
Grounded
Theory
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967).
The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.
Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Adele E. Clarke Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern
Turn. Sage, 2005 (forthcoming).
|
the link between
technology and social theory
An anthropologist's view:
Lucy
Suchman including (links fixed)
Lucy Suchman (2000), Located
Accountabilities in Technology Production
Lucy Suchman (1987). Plans and situated actions : The problem of human-machine
communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Another anthropologist:
Diana Forsythe
Forsythe, D. Studying Those Who Study Us: an Anthropologist in the
World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University Press, Stanford,
CA, 2001.
Forsythe, D. "It's just a matter
of common sense": Ethnography as invisible work. Studying
Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence.
Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 2001.
Forsythe, D. Ethics and politics of
studying up in technoscience. Studying Those Who Study Us: an
Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford
University Press, Stanford, CA, 2001.
Forsythe, D. New bottles, old wine: hidden cultural assumptions in
a computerized explanation system for migraine sufferers. Studying
Those Who Study Us: an Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence.
Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 2001.
A technologist's
view:
Paul Dourish
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jpd/
various including
Dourish, P. (2004). What
we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous
Computing, 8.
Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied
Interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jpd/embodied/
Paul Dourish & Graham Button (1998). On “Technomethodology”:Foundational
Relationships between Ethnomethodology and System Design Human-Computer
Interaction 13: 395-432. Slightly different version: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jpd/
|
Situated Action,
Learning, Knowledge
Haraway, D. Situated knowledges: The
science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.
Feminist Studies, 14, 3 (2003) 575-600.
Lave, J., Wenger, E. Situated Learning:
Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
England, 1991.
Suchman, L. A. Plans and Situated Actions:
the Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1987.
|
Social Construction
of Technlogy (SCOT)
This is an approach that has not been
used in IT as much as I think it should be. We will examine it in order
to understnad it well enough to use it. My research group has been looking
at the complementary strengths and weaknesses off SCOT and AT for technology
design and use.
Pinch, Trevor J. and Wiebe E.Bijker.
1987. "The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or how the
sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each
other," in Bijker, Wiebe, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor E. Pinch,
eds., The Social Construction of Technological Systems (Cambridge MA:
MIT Press, 1989) , pp. 17-50.
Bijker, W. E. (1995). King of the road:
the social construction of the safety bicycle. In Of bicycles, bakelites,
and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change (pp. 19-100). Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Pinch, T. (1996). The social construction
of technology: a review. In R.Fox (Ed.), Technological change (pp. 17-35).
Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Recommended: Paul Rosen, The Social
Construction of Mountain Bikes: Technology and Postmodernity in the
Cycle Industry. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 23, No. 3. (Aug., 1993),
pp. 479-513 (Available from campus IP addresses only)
|
Texts and artifacts
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope
: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press. Chapter 2: Circulation
Reference: Sampling the Soil in the Amazon Forest.
Latour (1986) Bruno Latour, ‘Visualization
and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands’, Knowledge and
Society 6: 1-40.
Law, J. (1986). The heterogeneity of texts. In M.Callon, J. Law, &
A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology
of Science in the Real World (pp. 67-83). London: Macmillan Press.
Rip, A. (1986). Mobilizing Resources through Texts. In M.Callon, J.
Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology:
Sociology of Science in the Real World (pp. 84-99). London: Macmillan
Press.
|
Users: Constructing
Users, Incorporating Users in Design
Akrich, M. User representation: practices,
methods, and sociology. In Rip A., Misa T. J., Schmit J. (eds.). Managing
Technology in Society: the Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment.
Pinter, New York, 1995.
Glock, F. Design Tools and Framing Practices.
Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 2 (2003) 221-239.
Grint, K., Woolgar, S. Configuring the
user: inventing new technologies. The Machine at Work : Technology,
Work, and Organization. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997.
Mackay, H. et al Reconfiguring the user:
Using rapid application development. Social Studies of Science, 30,
5 (2000) 737-757.
Summerton, J. Do Electrons Have Politics?
Constructing User Identities in Swedish Electricity. Science, Technology,
and Human Values, 29, 4 (2005) 486-511.
Woolgar, S. Configuring the user: The
case of usability trials. In Law J. (ed.). A Sociology of Monsters:
Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. Routledge, London, 1991.
Oudshoorn N., Pinch T. (eds.). How Users
Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. MIT Press., Cambridge,
MA, 2003.
|
Visual Studies
This field has two emphases: (1) the use of images as
evidence in social science research, and (2) images and their use in
people's lives. My own work incorporates both: I use images (among other
resources) to study the personal use of images and the changes made
possible by new technology (including cameraphones and photoblogs).
We may do some reading in this area, if enough people are interested.
Barnhurst, K. G., Vari, M., and Rodriguez,
I. Mapping Visual Studies in Communication. Journal of Communication,
54, 4 (2004) 616-644.
Chalfen, R. Snapshot Versions of Life.
Bowling Green State University Popular Press, Bowling Green, Ohio, 1987.
Frohlich, D., Kuchinsky, A., Pering,
C., Don, A., and Ariss, S. Requirements for Photoware, in ACM Conference
on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2002), ACM Press, 166-175.
Prosser, J. Image-Based Research: a
Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers. Falmer Press, London; Bristol,
PA, 1998.
Wagner, J. (ed.) Images of Information
: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications, Beverly
Hills, 1979.
|
Work Practice
and Technology
Suchman, L. A., Blomberg, J.; Orr, J.E.;
Trigg, R. Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American
Behavioral Scientist 43, 3 (1999) 392-408. Available online from
campus addresses. Go to http://sunsite2.berkeley.edu:8000/
and search on the journal title.
Blomberg, J., Burrell, M., Guest, G.
An ethnographic approach to design. In Jacko J. A., Sears A. (eds.).
The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies
and Emerging Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Mahwah,
New Jersey, 2003.
Suchman, L., Trigg, R. H., and Blomberg,
J. Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. British Journal
of Sociology 53, 2 (2002) 163-179. Available
online from campus addresses.
Another version: Paper presented at
the 1998 American Sociological Association in the session Ethnomethodology:
Hybrid Studies of the Workplace and Technology, August 22, 1998, San
Francisco, CA.
|